Systematic review2026

Understanding problematic TikTok use: A systematic review of emerging diagnostic and therapeutic implications in clinical psychology

Caponnetto P, Lanzafame I, Prezzavento GC, Rawashdeh S, Moussa MA, Fakhrou A

Journal of addictive diseases · 7 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2025-03-13 · J Addict Dis · vol. 44 · issue 2 · pp. 144–165
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
15 citations · more than 95% of similar papers · 5.2× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
52 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
TikTok addiction, behavioral addiction, diagnostic classification, craving, salience, tolerance, abstinence, therapeutic interventions, social media addiction
MeSH
humans, behavior, addictive, psychology, clinical

6 authors

From IT, EG, QA

  • Pasquale CaponnettoUniversity of Catania
  • Ines LanzafameUniversity of Catania
  • Graziella Chiara Prezzavento · correspondingUniversity of Catania
  • Shatha Rawashdeh
  • Mahmoud Ali MoussaSuez Canal University
  • Abdulnaser Abdulraheem FakhrouQatar University

Abstract

TikTok's rapid rise has spurred concerns about its potential to cause problematic use behaviors, which some consider akin to addiction. This systematic review seeks to understand the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of TikTok use within the scope of clinical psychology. From September 15, 2023 to March 30, 2024 a systematic review was conducted to investigate whether this new pathological condition can be recognized as a behavioral addiction. We searched the following databases for relevant studies: PubMed, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), PsycINFO, MDPI, Frontiers in Psychology, ScienceDirect, and ReserchGate. We identified a total of 294 unique articles. 45 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and only 21 of these met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final systematic review. We identified factors like salience, craving, and abstinence related to problematic TikTok use, confirming its potential risk as a behavioral addiction. Currently, there are neither established guidelines, nor an acceptable number of clinical cases, to determine the inclusion of TikTok addiction within an official classification. Additional considerations include the assessed target population, geographical differences, and the lack of specific treatments or interventions. Our study confirms that problematic TikTok use must be considered an addiction both for the considerable risk it entails and for its developmental trajectory. Through the analysis of the included studies, we confirmed elevated levels of salience, abstinence, tolerance, craving, excessive use, desire to control consumption, and alterations in daily life habits associated with problematic TikTok use.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.