Total, unprocessed, and processed red meat intake in relation to the risk of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
Ghosn B, Baniasadi MM, Jalalzadeh M, Esmaillzadeh A
Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 4 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2025-03-19 · Clin Nutr ESPEN · vol. 67 · pp. 265–275
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Cited
- 4 citations · more than 71% of similar papers · 1.1× the field average
- References
- 53 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Medicine, Meta-analysis, Pancreatic cancer, Prospective cohort study, Internal medicine, Oncology, Cancer
- MeSH
- humans, pancreatic neoplasms, diet, risk factors, prospective studies, food handling, meat products, female, male, red meat
4 authors
From IR
- Batoul GhosnTehran University of Medical Sciences
- Mohammadreza Moradi BaniasadiTehran University of Medical Sciences
- Moharam JalalzadehTehran University of Medical Sciences
- Ahmad EsmaillzadehIsfahan University of Medical Sciences; Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center; Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Data on the association between red meat from both processed and unprocessed sources and risk of pancreatic cancer is controversial. Therefore, this study summarized current evidence on the relationship between red and processed red meat intake and pancreatic cancer risk through a meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Scopus for prospective cohorts up to October 2024. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest vs. the lowest category of the exposures were combined using random-effects models. Dose-response relations were explored by one-stage weighted mixed effects meta-analysis. 19 studies involving 4,291,065 participants with 13,820 pancreatic cancer cases were included. The highest intake of total red meat was positively related to risk of pancreatic cancer (Pooled HR: 1.12, 95%CIs: 1.01, 1.24; I2: 36.5 %, PQ-test: 0.10). Such association was not significant for unprocessed (Pooled HR: 1.05, 95%CIs: 0.88, 1.24; I2: 66.6 %, PQ-test: 0.002) and processed (Pooled HR: 1.02, 95%CIs: 0.86, 1.21; I2: 66.0 %, PQ-test: 0.001) red meat intake. No significant association was observed between each 3 serving/wk of total, unprocessed, and processed red meat and risk of pancreatic cancer. Also, no evidence for a nonlinear association was found for all associations. This meta-analysis suggests a positive relation between the highest consumption of total red meat and pancreatic cancer. However, this relation was not substantial in terms of unprocessed and processed red meat.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.