Randomized controlled trial2025Open access

Cold Water Immersion Does Not Enhance Recovery and Performance After High-Intensity Interval Dorsiflexion Exercise

Richards AJ, Malekzadeh R, Elghobashy ME, Laham R, Power GA, Paris MT, Cheng AJ

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 3 citations

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
York University
Government
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Government
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada-Discovery Grant
University or hospital
York University Muscle Health Research Centre Graduate Student Fellowship
Government
Canadian Foundation for Innovation - John R. Evan's Leaders Fund and Ontario Research Fund
University or hospital
York University Faculty of Health Combined Junior Faculty Fund/Minor Research Grant
Grants
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 2020); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (dgecr-2020-00136); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (rgpin-2020-06443)

Based on 6 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2025-05-01 · Scand J Med Sci Sports · vol. 35 · issue 5 · p. e70061
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
8 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.4× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
44 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Crossover study, Ankle dorsiflexion, Concentric, Medicine, Ankle, Plantar flexion, High-intensity interval training, Internal medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Physical therapy, Cardiology, Anesthesia, Surgery, Mathematics
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, water, body temperature, cross-over studies, immersion, muscle fatigue, muscle contraction, torque, adult, female, male, cold temperature, young adult, high-intensity interval training

7 authors

From CA

  • Andrew John RichardsYork University
  • Rohin MalekzadehYork University
  • Mohamed E. ElghobashyUniversity of Toronto
  • Robert LahamYork University
  • Geoffrey A. PowerUniversity of Guelph
  • Michael T. ParisYork University

Abstract

Cold-water immersion (CWI) has become a widely adopted method for post-exercise recovery. However, its effectiveness in restoring neuromuscular function remains inconclusive. This study examined the impact of CWI on recovery following high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE). Twelve young, recreationally active individuals (10 males, 2 females) participated in a randomized crossover study. Each session included six sets of 30-s all-out isokinetic concentric contractions of the ankle dorsiflexor and plantar flexor muscles, followed by 10 min of room temperature rest (RT) or CWI at 10°C. Neuromuscular function and intramuscular temperature were evaluated periodically over 24 h, as well as next-day fatigue resistance of the dorsiflexors. In both conditions, maximal voluntary contraction torque remained impaired for up to 3 h without significant changes in voluntary activation (p > 0.05). Electrically stimulated torque showed no difference in the fatigue-induced decline or recovery of 10 Hz torque, which also remained impaired for up to 3 h. However, 50 Hz torque recovered within 1 h following RT, whereas it remained slightly reduced for up to 3 h following CWI. The 10:50 Hz torque ratio showed immediate recovery with CWI, whereas RT recovery was delayed for up to 1 h. Notably, the ratio was significantly lower with RT at 0-, 0.5-, and 1-h post-intervention. Despite these differences, HIIE performance during a repeat bout conducted 24 h later remained similar. In conclusion, 10 min of CWI at 10°C does not enhance post-exercise recovery or next-day exercise performance following HIIE.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.