Meta-analysis2025

Ultra-processed food consumption is linked to an increased risk of chronic respiratory diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Mekonnen TC, Shi Z, Gebremichael B, Melaku YA, Gill TK

Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Health and Medical Research Council
Grants
National Health and Medical Research Council (2009776)

Based on 1 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2025-06-12 · Clin Nutr ESPEN · vol. 68 · pp. 647–659
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
4 citations · more than 73% of similar papers · 1.1× the field average
References
75 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Prospective cohort study, Cohort study, Intensive care medicine, Cohort, Environmental health, Respiratory system, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, respiratory tract diseases, chronic disease, diet, risk factors, prospective studies, adult, middle aged, female, male, fast foods, food, processed

5 authors

From AU, QA

  • Tefera Chane MekonnenSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; The University of Adelaide
  • Zumin ShiQatar University
  • Bereket GebremichaelThe University of Adelaide
  • Yohannes Adama MelakuFlinders University; Flinders Medical Centre; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Tiffany K GillSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute

Abstract

Background

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) are a leading cause of global mortality, with dietary factors, including ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption, contributing to their burden. The relationship between UPF intake and CRD risk in adults remains unclear.

Objectives

This study evaluates epidemiological evidence linking UPF exposure to overall CRD risk and cause-specific respiratory conditions.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, covering studies from 2009 to January 2024. Cohort studies examining UPF exposure and CRD risk were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health tool, and NutriGrade scoring evaluated the quality of meta-evidence. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

Six cohort studies (k = 18) involving 948,428 participants and 11,341 CRD events were analyzed. Higher UPF exposure was associated with an increased CRD risk but not lung cancer. Each 10 % increase in UPF intake corresponded to a 19 % higher CRD risk (relative risk [RR] = 1.19; 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1.004-1.40; NutriGrade = moderate) but showed no significant association with lung cancer (RR = 1.09; 95 % CI: 0.88-1.38; NutriGrade = very low). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Greater UPF consumption is linked to higher CRD risk, underscoring the need for public health interventions to reduce UPF exposure and mitigate CRD burden. High study heterogeneity highlights the need for further mechanistic research.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42022345920.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.