Randomized controlled trial2025

Effects of a Blend of Trisodium Citrate, Creatine Monohydrate, Leucine, and Blueberry Extract on Training-Induced Changes in Leg Extension Strength, Endurance, and Muscle Size

Roberts TD, Arnett JE, Ortega DG, Pioske JS, Daugherty FJ, Tempesta MS, Dash AK, Schmidt RJ, Housh TJ

Journal of dietary supplements · 0 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2025-06-19 · J Diet Suppl · vol. 22 · issue 4 · pp. 584–612
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Cited
2 citations · more than 72% of similar papers · 1.0× the field average
References
71 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Leg press, Trisodium citrate, Placebo, Medicine, Creatine, Endurance training, One-repetition maximum, Internal medicine, Physical therapy, Resistance training, Endocrinology, Chemistry, Biochemistry
MeSH
leg, muscle, skeletal, humans, creatine, citrates, leucine, plant extracts, double-blind method, physical endurance, dietary supplements, adult, male, muscle strength, resistance training, young adult, blueberry plants

9 authors

From US

  • Trevor D. Roberts · correspondingUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Jocelyn E. ArnettUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Dolores G. OrtegaUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • Justin S. PioskeUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
  • F. Joseph Daugherty
  • Michael S. Tempesta

Abstract

Although creatine monohydrate (CM), leucine, and polyphenols have been independently researched, there is a lack of research on the effects of a supplementation blend containing trisodium citrate, CM, leucine, and blueberry extract (TCLB) on muscle strength, endurance, and size. This study compared the effects of 8 wk of supplementation with TCLB versus CM and placebo (PLA) combined with resistance training on leg extension strength, endurance, and muscle size. Twenty-eight recreationally active men ingested either TCLB (n = 10), CM (n = 10), or PLA (n = 8) during 8 wk of resistance training. Leg extension 1-repetition maximum (1RM), leg extension repetitions-to-failure at ∼80% of pre-training 1RM, individual quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) values, and the sum of the CSA values (CSAsum) were assessed at pre-training and post-training. Separate one-way ANCOVAs covaried for pre-training values were used to analyze differences in adjusted post-training means. Separate Chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences between groups in the proportion of subjects that exceeded the minimal important difference (MID). There were no group differences (p > 0.05) for leg extension 1RM, leg extension repetitions-to-failure, rectus femoris CSA, vastus lateralis CSA, or vastus medialis CSA. The TCLB group demonstrated greater (p ≤ 0.05) adjusted post-training means and proportions of subjects who exceeded the MID for the CSAsum and vastus intermedius CSA than the PLA group, but the TCLB group did not differ (p > 0.05) from the CM group for those variables. The CM group (p ≤ 0.05) exhibited a greater proportion of subjects who exceeded the MID for the CSAsum than the PLA group. These findings indicated that 8 wk of supplementation with TCLB and CM combined with resistance training increased the overall quadriceps muscle size greater than the PLA, but TCLB did not differ from CM. Furthermore, the groups did not differ in the training-induced increases in leg extension strength and endurance.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.