Randomized controlled trial2025Industry funded

Funded in part by Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Fonden, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Novo Nordisk Foundation

Effect of ultra-processed food consumption on male reproductive and metabolic health

Preston JM, Iversen J, Hufnagel A, Hjort L, Taylor J, Sanchez C, George V, Hansen AN, Ängquist L, Hermann S, Craig JM, Torekov S, Lindh C, Hougaard KS, Nóbrega MA, Simpson SJ, Barrès R

Cell metabolism · 21 citations

Review labels

Controlled feedingIndustry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function
Intake measured by
Food provided by researchers

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Government
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
University or hospital
Lunds Universitet
Company
Novo Nordisk
Company
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Company
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research
Company
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Government
French National Research Agency
Grants
Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 18 CC0034900); Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0033754); Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research (NNF 18 CC0034900); Novo Nordisk (NNF18CC0034900); Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF33754); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0028); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (-15-IDEX-01); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐15‐IDEX‐01)

Based on 7 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2025-08-28 · Cell Metab · vol. 37 · issue 10 · pp. 1950–1960.e2
Publisher
Cell Press
Cited
38 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 33.7× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
41 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
Consumption (sociology), Food consumption, Biology, Medicine, Physiology, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Biotechnology
MeSH
humans, body weight, cross-over studies, energy metabolism, energy intake, reproduction, adult, male, young adult, fast foods, food, processed

17 authors

From DK, FR, AU, SE, US

  • Jessica M. PrestonUniversity of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Jo Frøkjær IversenUniversity of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Antonia HufnagelUniversity of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Line HjortUniversity of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Jodie Herk TaylorUniversity of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • Clara SanchezCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Inserm; Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire

Abstract

Consumption of ultra-processed food is associated with increased caloric intake and impaired health. Here, we conducted a nutrition trial (NCT05368194) with controlled, 2 × 2 crossover design and tested whether ultra-processed food impairs reproductive and metabolic fitness, with further aggravation by excess caloric intake. Comparing the response from an unprocessed to ultra-processed diet identified increased body weight and low-density lipoprotein (LDL):high-density lipoprotein (HDL) ratio, independent of caloric load. Several hormones involved in energy metabolism and spermatogenesis were affected, including decreased levels of growth/differentiation factor 15 and follicle-stimulating hormone. Sperm quality trended toward impairment, with a decrease in total motility. Differential accumulation of pollutants between the discordant diets were detected, such as decreased plasma lithium and a trend for increased levels of the phthalate mono(4-methyl-7-carboxyheptyl)phthalate (cxMINP) in serum, following the ultra-processed diet. Alteration in caloric load alone had distinct effects on the measured outcomes. This study provides evidence that consumption of ultra-processed food is detrimental for cardiometabolic and reproductive outcomes, regardless of excessive caloric intake.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.