Dietary cholesterol intake and egg consumption in relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after stroke
Xia L, Xu T, Zhan Z
Scientific reports · 1 citation
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
- Intake measured by
- Food diaries or recalls
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
Based on full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2025-10-08 · Sci Rep · vol. 15 · issue 1 · p. 35163
- Publisher
- Nature Portfolio
- Cited
- 2 citations · more than 86% of similar papers · 1.8× the field average
- References
- 51 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Diet and metabolism studies · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- Stroke (engine), Dietary Cholesterol, Cohort study, Proportional hazards model, Cohort, Diabetes mellitus, Cholesterol, Confidence interval, Population, Prospective cohort study
- MeSH
- humans, cardiovascular diseases, cholesterol, dietary, nutrition surveys, proportional hazards models, risk factors, prospective studies, eggs, adult, aged, middle aged, united states, female, male, stroke
3 authors
From CN
- Lingfan Xia · correspondingTaizhou First People's Hospital
- Tong XuWenzhou Medical University; Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
- Zhenxiang ZhanZhejiang University
Abstract
The findings on the associations of dietary cholesterol intake and egg consumption with mortality in the general population remain inconclusive. Our objective was to evaluate all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in relation to dietary cholesterol intake and egg consumption in a cohort of stroke survivors, a particularly vulnerable population. We conducted a prospective cohort analysis of 1367 stroke survivors recruited across the United States between 1999 and 2018. Dietary information was evaluated by a 24-h dietary recall at baseline obtained from NHANES while mortality data were derived from the National Death Index with follow-up through 2019. To investigate the associations of dietary cholesterol intake or egg consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, Cox proportional hazards and restricted cubic splines models were utilized. After a median follow-up of 79.0 months, the incidence per 1000 person-years was 59.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.2-64.9) for all-cause and 23.3 (95% CI, 20.4-26.5) for cardiovascular mortality. Each 100 mg/1000 kcal/day elevation in cholesterol intake was related to raised risk of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31). A greater risk of all-cause mortality was shown in participants consuming > 1 egg/day (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06-1.84). The dose-response analysis highlighted the lowest risk of all-cause mortality when egg consumption was around 33.3 g/day. The observed correlations of dietary cholesterol intake or egg consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were stronger in the subgroups with cardiometabolic diseases (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia) or risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases (advanced age). Among stoke survivors, greater dietary cholesterol connects to an escalated risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a linear manner. Moderate egg consumption (≤ 1 egg/day) is relatively safe and excessive consumption links to an elevated risk of all-cause mortality.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.