Study2025Open access

The effect of <i>Withania somnifera</i> (Ashwagandha) on mental health symptoms in individuals with mental disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

Marchi M, Grenzi P, Travascio A, Uberti D, De Micheli E, Quartaroli F, Laquatra G, Pingani L, Ferrari S, Galeazzi GM

BJPsych open · 1 citation

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2025-10-27 · BJPsych Open · vol. 11 · issue 6 · p. e260
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Cited
3 citations · more than 75% of similar papers · 1.2× the field average
References
56 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants · Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection · Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
Mental health, Anxiety, Depression (economics), Systematic review, MEDLINE, Replicate

10 authors

From IT

  • Mattia MarchiUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia; Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
  • Pietro GrenziUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Antonio TravascioUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia; Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
  • Daniele UbertiUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia; Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
  • Edoardo De MicheliUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Fabio QuartaroliUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia

Abstract

Background

Withania somnifera (WS) is considered an adaptogen agent with reported antistress, cognition facilitating and anti-inflammatory properties, which may be beneficial in the treatment of mental disorders.

Aims

This systematic review investigated the efficacy and tolerability of Withania somnifera for mental health symptoms in individuals with mental disorders.

Method

The protocol of this review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023467959). PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing Withania somnifera to any comparator, in people of any age, with any mental disorder. The meta-analyses were based on standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, estimated through frequentist and Bayesian-hierarchical models with random-effects.

Results

Fourteen studies, corresponding to 360 people treated with Withania somnifera and 353 controls were included. Anxiety disorders were the predominant diagnostic category. Thirteen trials administered Withania somnifera orally (median dose 600 mg/day), one with Shirodhara therapy. The median follow-up time was 8 weeks. Although limited by the small number of studies, substantial between-study heterogeneity, and outlier effects, our investigation showed Withania somnifera effectiveness in improving anxiety (outlier-corrected SMD: -1.13 (95% CI: -1.65; -0.60), pooled SMD: -1.962 (95% CI: -2.66; -0.57)), depression (SMD: -1.28 (95% CI: -2.40; -0.16) and stress (SMD: -0.95 (95% CI: -1.46; -0.43) symptoms and sleep quality (SMD: -1.35 (95% CI: -1.79; -0.91). The effect size was confirmed using the Bayesian for anxiety but not for depression. No significant difference between Withania somnifera and the comparators was found for safety and tolerability.

Conclusions

We found evidence supporting the effectiveness of Withania somnifera in treating anxiety symptoms. Future trials should replicate this finding in larger samples and further clarify a possible Withania somnifera role in depression and insomnia treatment.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.