Consumption of ultraprocessed foods and breast density in adolescence
Devoto A, Garmendia ML, Jacard M, Pereira A
Scientific reports · 1 citation
How it was studied
- Design
- Cohort study (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Food diaries or recalls
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
- Nonprofit
- American Institute for Cancer Research
- Nonprofit
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
- Government
- Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
- Nonprofit
- American Institute of Cancer Research
- Government
- National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development from the Government of Chile (FONDECYT)
- Grants
- Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (1230813); American Institute for Cancer Research (961157)
Based on 5 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2025-11-10 · Sci Rep · vol. 15 · issue 1 · p. 39335
- Publisher
- Nature Portfolio
- Cited
- 1 citation · more than 73% of similar papers · 0.6× the field average
- References
- 52 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Research areas
- Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging · Cancer Risks and Factors · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Quartile, Menarche, Confounding, Menstrual cycle, Cohort, Body mass index, Breast cancer, Cohort study, Longitudinal study, Obesity
- MeSH
- breast, humans, breast neoplasms, diet, risk factors, longitudinal studies, menarche, adolescent, child, female, fast foods, breast density
4 authors
From CL
- Angela DevotoUniversity of Chile
- María Luisa GarmendiaUniversity of Chile
- Marcela JacardClínica Alemana; Ministry of Health
- Ana Paula Rodrigues Pereira · correspondingUniversity of Chile
Abstract
Breast density (BD) is one of the major risk factors for breast cancer (BC) and has the potential to be used as an early marker. Puberty is a critical period for carcinogenesis, and identifying events that modify BD during this stage could aid in understanding future BC risk. The consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has been associated with BC; however, evidence of their effect on BD, particularly in adolescents, is lacking. To assess the association between the intake of UPFs during the peripubertal period and BD measured at 4 years after menarche onset, absolute fibroglandular volume (AFGV) and the percentage of fibroglandular volume (%FGV) were used. The Growth and Obesity Cohort Study is a longitudinal study of 550 girls recruited in 2006 at daycare centers in the southeastern area of Santiago, Chile. We measured the %FGV and AFGV via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) 4 years after menarche. Girls had at least one 24-h dietary recall survey (R24H) during the peripubertal period. Simple and multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between UPF consumption (calories and grams, categorized in quartiles according to the sample distribution) and BD outcomes, adjusting for confounders such as birth weight, body mass index, tobacco use, physical activity, menstrual cycle stage, maternal education, age at menarche, total energy consumption, and maternal BD. Data from 330 girls revealed an average daily intake of 1849 kcal (41.67% from UPFs). No consistent associations were observed between UPF intake and %FGV and AFGV.]. Stratification by menstrual cycle phase revealed a significant increase in %FGV and AFGV for Q2 vs. Q1 UPF intake as a percentage of grams in the follicular stage [β: 0.12; 95% CI 0.01, 0.22 and β: 0.25; 95% CI 0.07, 0.43, respectively]. UPF consumption during puberty showed no consistent association with BD, except in girls whose UPF consumption was measured during the follicular phase. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and understand the effects of food processing on BD.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.