Meta-analysis2025

The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Park YS, Kim MS, Cho JH, Kang YJ

Lasers in medical science · 0 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2025-11-15 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 40 · issue 1 · p. 478
Publisher
Springer Science+Business Media
Cited
1 citation · more than 46% of similar papers · 0.2× the field average
References
25 works
Access
Paywalled
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Sinusitis and nasal conditions · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial, Cochrane Library, Low level laser therapy, Chronic rhinosinusitis, MEDLINE, Sample size determination, Meta-analysis, Web of science
MeSH
humans, sinusitis, rhinitis, chronic disease, treatment outcome, low-level light therapy, rhinosinusitis

4 authors

From KR

  • Youn Sun ParkThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
  • Min Su KimThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
  • Jin‐Hee ChoThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
  • Yun Jin Kang · correspondingThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed to assess the efficacy and the safety of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and photobiomodulation (PBMT) in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). A comprehensive search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for studies published up to June 30th, 2025. Eligible studies included patients with CRS who underwent LLLT or PBMT, and reported quantitative outcomes. Primary outcomes were subjective symptom scores, while secondary outcomes such as headache, fatigue, and computed tomography (CT) findings were analyzed when available. Six studies including 162 patients were analyzed. LLLT or PBMT was associated with significant improvement in subjective symptom scores at 2 weeks (SMD 0.64; 95% CI [0.26; 1.01], I² = 0%, p = 0.0009), at 4 weeks (SMD 2.66; 95% CI [1.14; 4.19], I² = 92%, p = 0.0006), and at 2-6 months (SMD 0.86; 95% CI [0.39; 1.33], I² = 0%, p = 0.0003). However, no significant improvement was observed in objective CT-based measures (SMD 0.34; 95% CI [-0.01; 0.69], I² = 0%, p = 0.06), and also secondary outcomes such as headache and fatigue showed no consistent benefit. The largest effect was observed at 4 weeks, but this result should be interpreted with caution given the extreme heterogeneity across studies. LLLT and PBMT appear to provide symptomatic benefit in patients with CRS, but the evidence remains preliminary due to limited sample size and substantial heterogeneity. Larger randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols are required to validate these findings and to define the clinical role of photobiomodulation in CRS management.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.