The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Park YS, Kim MS, Cho JH, Kang YJ
Lasers in medical science · 0 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2025-11-15 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 40 · issue 1 · p. 478
- Publisher
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Cited
- 1 citation · more than 46% of similar papers · 0.2× the field average
- References
- 25 works
- Access
- Paywalled
- Research areas
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Sinusitis and nasal conditions · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
- Keywords
- Randomized controlled trial, Cochrane Library, Low level laser therapy, Chronic rhinosinusitis, MEDLINE, Sample size determination, Meta-analysis, Web of science
- MeSH
- humans, sinusitis, rhinitis, chronic disease, treatment outcome, low-level light therapy, rhinosinusitis
4 authors
From KR
- Youn Sun ParkThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
- Min Su KimThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
- Jin‐Hee ChoThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
- Yun Jin Kang · correspondingThe Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital; Catholic University of Korea
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed to assess the efficacy and the safety of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and photobiomodulation (PBMT) in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). A comprehensive search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for studies published up to June 30th, 2025. Eligible studies included patients with CRS who underwent LLLT or PBMT, and reported quantitative outcomes. Primary outcomes were subjective symptom scores, while secondary outcomes such as headache, fatigue, and computed tomography (CT) findings were analyzed when available. Six studies including 162 patients were analyzed. LLLT or PBMT was associated with significant improvement in subjective symptom scores at 2 weeks (SMD 0.64; 95% CI [0.26; 1.01], I² = 0%, p = 0.0009), at 4 weeks (SMD 2.66; 95% CI [1.14; 4.19], I² = 92%, p = 0.0006), and at 2-6 months (SMD 0.86; 95% CI [0.39; 1.33], I² = 0%, p = 0.0003). However, no significant improvement was observed in objective CT-based measures (SMD 0.34; 95% CI [-0.01; 0.69], I² = 0%, p = 0.06), and also secondary outcomes such as headache and fatigue showed no consistent benefit. The largest effect was observed at 4 weeks, but this result should be interpreted with caution given the extreme heterogeneity across studies. LLLT and PBMT appear to provide symptomatic benefit in patients with CRS, but the evidence remains preliminary due to limited sample size and substantial heterogeneity. Larger randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols are required to validate these findings and to define the clinical role of photobiomodulation in CRS management.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.