Study2026

Oral magnesium and outcomes in US veterans with heart failure

Yin Y, Costello RB, Fonarow GC, Heidenreich PA, Morgan CJ, Faselis C, Cheng Y, Zullo AR, Liu S, Lam PH, Rosanoff A, Vargas JD, Gottlieb SS, Deedwania P, Moore HJ, Shao Y, Sheriff HM, Wu WC, Zeng-Treitler Q, Ahmed A

European heart journal · 5 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Office of Dietary Supplements
Government
Department of Veterans' Affairs, Australian Government
University or hospital
Norges Idrettshøgskole
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Government
NIH
Government
US Government
Government
VA
Government
VA Information Resource Center
Government
HSRD VA
Government
NHLBI
Government
NIH HHS
Government
VA/CMS
Government
NHLBI NIH HHS
Government
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements
Government
Department of Veterans Affairs
Grants
Office of Dietary Supplements (5R01HL156518)

Based on 16 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2025-10-14 · Eur Heart J · vol. 47 · issue 1 · pp. 80–90
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Cited
6 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.0× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
46 works
Access
Open access (repository copy)
Research areas
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Potassium and Related Disorders · Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
Heart failure, Magnesium, Clinical trial, Risk factor, MEDLINE
MeSH
humans, magnesium deficiency, magnesium, treatment outcome, hospitalization, administration, oral, aged, middle aged, veterans, united states, female, male, heart failure

20 authors

From US

  • Ying Yin · correspondingGeorge Washington University; Veterans Health Administration
  • Rebecca B. CostelloNational Institutes of Health; Office of Dietary Supplements
  • Gregg C. FonarowUniversity of California, Los Angeles
  • Paul A. HeidenreichVeterans Health Administration; Palo Alto Veterans Institute for Research; Stanford University
  • Charity Johanna MorganVeterans Health Administration; University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Charles J. FaselisUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; George Washington University; Veterans Health Administration

Abstract

Background and aims

Magnesium deficiency is associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), but less is known about the impact of oral magnesium therapy. This study aimed to examine the association of oral magnesium with outcomes in patients with HF and whether it depends on baseline serum magnesium.

Methods

Of 54 696 Veterans with HF (2001-2023) and hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium <1.7 mg/dL), 10 695 were initiated on oral magnesium (median dose, 420 mg/day). A propensity score-matched cohort of 21 098 patients (treated, n = 10 549) balanced on 71 baseline characteristics was assembled while remaining outcome-blinded. This process was repeated to assemble a matched cohort of 11 634 patients (treated, n = 5817) with normomagnesemia (serum magnesium, 1.7-2.3 mg/dL). Hazard ratios (HR) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for one-year outcomes associated with oral magnesium were estimated.

Results

In the hypomagnesemia cohort, HF hospitalization or death occurred in 21.7% of patients not receiving and 20.1% receiving oral magnesium (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.86-0.97). Respective HRs (95% CIs) in subgroups with serum magnesium 1.6 (n = 5929), 1.3-1.5 (n = 11 293) and 1.8 mg/dL, and not significant at 1.5-1.8 mg/dL.

Conclusions

Oral magnesium therapy was associated with a lower risk of HF hospitalization or death in patients with HF and hypomagnesemia. Future clinical trials need to confirm these findings.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.