Magnesium Supplementation and Tachyarrhythmias: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
Goulden R, Abrahamowicz M, Strumpf E, Tamblyn R
JAMA internal medicine · 4 citations
Review labels
Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.
How it was studied
- Design
- Controlled clinical trial (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Clinical events such as disease or death
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Funding not disclosed
Publication
- Published
- 2025-12-08 · JAMA Intern Med · vol. 186 · issue 2 · p. 183
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Cited
- 6 citations · more than 92% of similar papers · 3.0× the field average
- Impact
- Top 10% most cited in its field
- References
- 32 works
- Access
- Open access (repository copy)
- Research areas
- Magnesium in Health and Disease · Potassium and Related Disorders · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- Magnesium, Magnesium deficiency (plants), Clinical trial, Randomized controlled trial
- MeSH
- humans, tachycardia, tachycardia, supraventricular, magnesium, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, intensive care units, female, male
4 authors
From CA
- Robert GouldenMcGill University Health Centre; McGill University
- Michał AbrahamowiczMcGill University
- Erin StrumpfMcGill University
- Robyn M TamblynMcGill University
Abstract
Importance
Magnesium supplementation is regularly given to acutely ill patients with serum levels below the standard reference range, primarily for the prevention of tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation. The evidence for this practice and the specific treatment thresholds used is limited. Conventional observational studies of this question are at risk of confounding by indication and other biases.
Objective
To determine whether giving magnesium supplementation to patients with hypomagnesemia, as defined by a given institution's usual treatment cutoff, reduces adverse clinical outcome using a quasi-experimental study design that plausibly allows for causal inference.
Design, setting, and participants
This nonrandomized clinical trial of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing serum magnesium testing was conducted in 93 ICUs across the US and Europe between 2003 and 2022. A fuzzy regression discontinuity design was used, in which individuals just either side of the eligibility cutoff for magnesium supplementation were compared with regard to the study outcomes. This comparison was performed across a range of treatment cutoffs in current use, ranging from 1.6 mg/dL to 2.0 mg/dL. Data were analyzed from August to October 2025.
Exposures
Magnesium supplementation.
Main outcomes and measures
The primary outcome was ventricular or supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in the 24 hours after magnesium testing. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of hypotension or death.
Results
A total of 478 901 twenty-four-hour treatment windows from 171 727 ICU admissions were included in the study. A total of 72 767 admitted patients (42.4%) were female, 98 960 (57.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age of the cohort was 63 (16) years. There was no evidence of an effect of magnesium supplementation on the occurrence of tachyarrhythmia, with a risk difference of 0.1% (95% CI, -4.2 to 6.9). This was true across all the cutoff levels evaluated. There was similarly no association with the occurrence of hypotension (risk difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, -0.9 to 17.7) or death (risk difference, 1.4%; 95% CI, -0.6 to 5.3).
Conclusions and relevance
In this nonrandomized clinical trial, routine supplementation of magnesium with currently used doses and treatment thresholds was not associated with beneficial effects for individuals with serum magnesium values close to those cutoffs.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.