Meta-analysis2026Open access

The Impact of Cold-Water Immersion on Post-Match Recovery in Trained Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Veen J, Bergh C, Cao Y, Randers MB, Krustrup P, Edholm P

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 3 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-01-01 · Scand J Med Sci Sports · vol. 36 · issue 1 · p. e70202
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
4 citations · more than 99% of similar papers · 13.3× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
52 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY-NC
Research areas
Exercise and Physiological Responses · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Sprint, Delayed onset muscle soreness, Confidence interval, Muscle damage, Creatine kinase, Meta-analysis
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, creatine kinase, cryotherapy, immersion, recovery of function, soccer, muscle strength, athletic performance, cold temperature, myalgia

6 authors

From SE, DK

  • Jort VeenÖrebro University
  • Cecilia BerghÖrebro University
  • Yang CaoÖrebro University
  • Morten Bredsgaard RandersUniversity of Southern Denmark
  • Peter KrustrupUniversity of Southern Denmark
  • Peter Edholm · correspondingÖrebro University; Halmstad University

Abstract

Cold-water immersion (CWI) is widely used by elite soccer players to enhance recovery after match play, yet systematic evidence supporting the effectiveness of this intervention is lacking. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of CWI on the recovery of physical performance, muscle damage, and delayed muscle soreness in trained soccer players after match play. A systematic database search was conducted and inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed, controlled trials; (2) competitive soccer players; (3) comparison of CWI with control/placebo after match/simulated match-play; (4) at least one of the following outcomes: 20 m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), leg strength via maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), creatine kinase (CK) for muscle damage, or delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS); and (5) outcome measurements taken 24, 48 or 72 h post-match. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals (PI). Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. CWI significantly improved recovery of MVC (SMD = 1.02 [95% CI: 0.55 to 1.50; 95% PI: -0.48 to 2.53]) and CMJ (SMD = 0.38 [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.64; 95% PI: -0.39 to 1.15]), while sprint performance remained unaffected (SMD = -0.59 [95% CI: -1.41 to 0.23; 95% PI: -4.14 to 2.95]). CWI reduced CK levels (SMD = -0.77 [95% CI: -1.17 to -0.37; 95% PI: -2.23 to 0.69]) and alleviated DOMS (SMD = -1.04 [95% CI: -1.91 to -0.17; 95% PI: -4.12 to 2.03]). MVC and CK recovery improved consistently across all time points, while DOMS relief was observed at 24 and 72 h post-match. CMJ benefits were only evident at 48 h post-match. However, as the 95% PIs for all outcomes included the null effect, the observed benefits should be interpreted cautiously, as future studies may yield smaller or null effects. Overall, CWI may enhance recovery of muscle strength, reduce muscle damage, and alleviate soreness in trained male and female soccer players, but does not seem to impact sprint performance, and its effect on CMJ is time-dependent.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.