Systematic review2026Open access

The Effect of Creatine Monohydrate on Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials: Effet du monohydrate de créatine sur les troubles mentaux : examen systématique des essais contrôlés à répartition aléatoire

Jeryous Fares B, Zhou C, Fabiano N, Wong S, Stubbs B, Shorr R, Puder D, Candow DG, Ostojic SM, Solmi M

Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 0 citations

How it was studied

Design
Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-01-20 · Can J Psychiatry · vol. 71 · issue 10 · pp. 741–751
Publisher
SAGE Publishing
Cited
2 citations · more than 88% of similar papers · 3.2× the field average
References
45 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial, Major depressive disorder, Escitalopram, Pharmacotherapy, Placebo, Bipolar disorder, Meta-analysis, Depression (economics), Citalopram
MeSH
humans, creatine, mental disorders, bipolar disorder, randomized controlled trials as topic, major depressive disorder

10 authors

From CA, AT, GB, NO, DE

  • Bassam Jeryous FaresUniversity of Ottawa
  • Carl ZhouUniversity of Ottawa
  • Nicholas FabianoUniversity of Ottawa
  • Stanley WongUniversity of Ottawa; University of Toronto
  • Brendon StubbsUniversity of Vienna; King's College London
  • Risa ShorrOttawa Hospital

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review is to synthesize and evaluate the evidence involving creatine monohydrate supplementation (CrM) across mental disorders.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO were searched up to 09/30/2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of CrM on psychiatric symptoms and safety in participants with a mental disorder. Risk of bias was assessed.ResultsSix articles from five RCTs were included (CrM: n = 126, placebo: n = 112; mean age=36 ± 14 years; male sex = 26%). Four RCTs reported on major depressive disorder (MDD), one bipolar depression. No other mental disorders were investigated. Two RCTs were low risk of bias and three had some concerns. CrM dosing ranged from 2 to 10 g/day for 4-8 weeks as adjunct treatment. In the treatment of MDD, CrM was tested as combination with escitalopram (k = 1, outperforming selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) + placebo; Cohen's d = 1.13 at 8 weeks), pharmacotherapy augmentation in adults (k = 1) and female adolescents (k = 1, no difference vs placebo), psychotherapy augmentation (k = 1, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) + CrM outperforming CBT + placebo) in MDD, and as pharmacotherapy augmentation in bipolar depression (k = 1, no difference vs placebo augmentation). Two trials in MDD found a correlation between CrM brain N-acetylaspartate and phosphocreatine, which was associated with larger improvement. CrM was generally well-tolerated. Two CrM out of 17 participants experienced hypomania/mania.ConclusionCrM shows promise as a combination treatment with SSRIs or for augmenting psychotherapy in MDD in adults. Double-blind, large-scale RCTs investigating the efficacy of CrM, with and without first-line therapies, are needed across mental disorders.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.