Cross-sectional study2026Open access

The relationship among short-form video addiction, self-control, and emotional symptoms in college students: a network analysis

Zhang Y, Yu Q, Li T, Wu X, Cao J

BMC public health · 3 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Government
Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Government
Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities
Grants
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2024H031); Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (24YJAZH005)

Based on 3 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-02-03 · BMC Public Health · vol. 26 · issue 1
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
4 citations · more than 100% of similar papers · 55.6× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
30 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Mental Health Research Topics · Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
short video addiction, self-control, emotional symptoms, depression, anxiety, university students, uncontrollability, network centrality
MeSH
humans, cross-sectional studies, affective symptoms, behavior, addictive, students, universities, adolescent, female, male, young adult, surveys and questionnaires, self-control, internet addiction disorder

5 authors

From CN

  • Yani ZhangHarbin Medical University
  • Qingyuan YuHarbin Medical University
  • Tao LiHanjiang Normal University
  • Xuesong WuHarbin Medical University
  • Jianqin Cao · correspondingHarbin Medical University

Abstract

Background

Traditional regression or structural equation modeling often falls short in revealing the complex dynamic interactions among multiple variables. In contrast, network analysis not only conceptualizes college students'short video addiction, self-control, and emotional symptoms as interacting nodes, but also visually uncovers core symptoms and bridging mechanisms that are elusive to conventional approaches. Employing this method, the present study aims to elucidate the interactive mechanisms among college students' short video addiction, self-control, and emotional symptoms, thereby providing finer-grained empirical evidence for developing targeted intervention strategies.

Objective

This study employs network analysis to explore the relationships among short video addiction, self-control, and emotional symptoms in college students, aiming to provide empirical evidence for developing targeted interventions.

Methods

A cross-sectional design was adopted, with convenience sampling used to recruit participants from a medical university. A total of 5,754 valid questionnaires were collected. Measurement tools included the Short Video Addiction Scale for College Students, the Brief Self-Control Scale, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Regularized partial correlation networks were constructed using the "qgraph" and "bootnet" packages in R, and node centrality along with network stability were evaluated.

Results

The study revealed a complex interactive structure among short video addiction, self-control, and emotional symptoms. Statistically, "Uncontrollability" within short video addiction and "Self-discipline" within self-control demonstrated high centrality.

Conclusion

The study reveals a complex interactive structure among short video addiction, self-control, and emotional symptoms. Statistically, "Uncontrollability" within short video addiction and "Self-discipline" within self-control demonstrated high centrality. In practical terms, the findings suggest that enhancing self-discipline may serve as an effective entry point for intervening in addictive short video use behaviors.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.