Study2026Open access

Bioenergetic data from a creatine monohydrate pilot trial in Alzheimer's disease

K Taylor M, Smith AN, Choi IY, Lee P, Kelly E, Arora T, Sullivan DK, Burns JM, Swerdlow RH, Wilkins HM

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 1 citation

Review labels

Author industry tiesMechanisms only

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Mechanisms only

Who paid for it

Funding
Possibly industry funded
Nonprofit
Alzheimer's Association
Government
National Institutes of Health
Government
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Government
NIA NIH HHS
Nonprofit
Alzheimer's Association
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry
Grants
Alzheimer's Association (AARG-22-924314); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (# UL1TR002366); National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR002366); National Institutes of Health (P30AG072973); National Institutes of Health (K01AG065487)

Based on 5 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-01-01 · Alzheimers Dement (N Y) · vol. 12 · issue 1 · p. e70228
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
0 citations · more than 12% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
34 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
Pilot trial, Creatine, Bioenergetics, Disease, Clinical trial, Pilot program

10 authors

From US

  • Matthew K Taylor · correspondingAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; University of Kansas Medical Center
  • Aaron N SmithUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
  • In‐Young ChoiUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
  • Phil Young LeeUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
  • Emma KellyUniversity of Kansas Medical Center
  • Tanu AroraUniversity of Kansas Medical Center

Abstract

Background

Creatine monohydrate (CrM) may mitigate bioenergetic failure in Alzheimer's disease (AD) by supporting ATP buffering and modulating mitochondrial function. Building upon our previous findings that CrM is associated with increased brain creatine (Cr) and improved cognition in AD, we investigated our hypothesis that CrM is associated with improved bioenergetic biomarkers in AD.

Methods

In this single-arm pilot featuring participants with AD (n = 20, 35% female), we investigated changes in bioenergetic biomarkers after 8 weeks of CrM supplementation (20 g/day). We measured brain concentration of N-acetylaspartate (NAA) and glutathione (GSH) using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We measured platelet and lymphocyte mitochondrial respiration using Oroboros Oxygraph-2K respirometry, lymphocyte adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) using a bioluminescent assay, and lymphocyte reactive oxygen species (ROS) with flow cytometry using Amplex Red and MitoSOX. We also investigated sex-dependent bioenergetic responses.

Results

Brain NAA and GSH did not change. In females only, both platelet and lymphocyte mitochondrial respiration increased (p p p < 0.001) levels rose significantly in both sexes while ATP/ADP ratio, superoxide, and hydrogen peroxide remained stable.

Discussion

These data suggest CrM may augment systemic energy availability in both sexes and mitochondrial capacity in a sex-specific manner in AD. Interpretation of results from this pilot study is limited by lacking a control group, small sample size, and its relatively short timeframe. However, these preliminary findings support further investigation of CrM as a potential bioenergetic intervention in AD with well-designed RCTs, including exploration of potential sex-specific bioenergetic responses to CrM.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05383833, registered on May 20, 2022.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.