Study2026Industry fundedOpen access

Comparative Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Micronized Creatine Monohydrate (KleanCREATINE™) in Active Men: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study

Aggarwal P, Agarwal R

Cureus · 0 citations

Review labels

Author industry tiesIndustry funded

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Randomized controlled trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Industry funded
Authors
At least one author declares a financial tie to industry

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-02-06 · Cureus · vol. 18 · issue 2 · p. e103091
Publisher
Cureus, Inc.
Cited
0 citations · more than 8% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
18 works
Access
Open access (free to publish) · CC-BY
Research areas
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Pharmacokinetics, Cmax, Crossover study, Creatine, Clinical study, Bioavailability, Adverse effect

2 authors

From IN

  • Pravin K. Aggarwal
  • Ramshyam AgarwalLokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College

Abstract

Introduction This two-phase clinical study evaluated KleanCREATINE™ (micronized creatine monohydrate) for its pharmacokinetic properties, safety, and efficacy in active men. Materials and methods Phase I was a randomized, open-label, crossover study comparing its pharmacokinetic profile with a marketed creatine monohydrate in 10 healthy men. Phase II was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm trial in 52 active men over eight weeks, assessing the safety and efficacy of KleanCREATINE™ on muscle strength, endurance, hypertrophy, body composition, and perceived exertion. Results In Phase I, KleanCREATINE™ demonstrated better pharmacokinetics profile with higher Cmax (8.10 vs 4.80 nmol/UI), quicker Tmax (2 vs 3 hours), and greater relative bioavailability (160.42% in sequence one and 175.45% in sequence two) over the marketed formulation. Phase II revealed significant effectiveness of KleanCREATINE™ over eight weeks: significant reduction in body fat percentage (14.45%), increase in skeletal muscle (10.46%), and enhanced muscle hypertrophy. KleanCREATINE™ showed greater chest press endurance (60.05% vs 49.29%). Perceived exertion decreased more with KleanCREATINE™ (26.4% vs 13.46%). Both formulations demonstrated safety and tolerability, with no adverse effects reported. Conclusions Micronized KleanCREATINE™ exhibited faster absorption, higher bioavailability, and greater efficacy in improving strength, endurance, and body composition compared to standard creatine monohydrate, with an excellent safety profile. These findings suggest KleanCREATINE™ as a promising alternative for athletes and fitness enthusiasts.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.