Meta-analysis2026Open access

The Healing Effect of Photobiomodulation on Venous Leg Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rasul A, Plum F, Karmisholt KE, Kirketerp-Møller K

Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 1 citation

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Innovationsfonden
Government
Eurostars
Government
The Innovation Fund Denmark

Based on 3 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-03-01 · Wound Repair Regen · vol. 34 · issue 2 · p. e70144
Publisher
Wiley
Cited
2 citations · more than 94% of similar papers · 5.1× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
24 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dermatologic Treatments and Research · Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
Cochrane Library, Meta-analysis, Venous leg ulcer, Randomized controlled trial, Inclusion and exclusion criteria, MEDLINE, Confidence interval, Clinical trial, Web of science
MeSH
humans, varicose ulcer, treatment outcome, wound healing, low-level light therapy

4 authors

From DK

  • Aqella Rasul · correspondingBispebjerg Hospital
  • Frederik PlumBispebjerg Hospital
  • Katrine Elisabeth KarmisholtUniversity of Copenhagen; Bispebjerg Hospital
  • Klaus Kirketerp‐MøllerUniversity of Copenhagen; Bispebjerg Hospital

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers are common, costly and often slow to heal despite standard management. Photobiomodulation has been proposed as an adjuvant therapy to enhance wound repair. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation on healing outcomes in venous leg ulcers. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (1990-2024) identified randomised controlled trials evaluating photobiomodulation in adults with venous leg ulcers. Two reviewers independently screened studies (n = 3824) and assessed eligibility according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria (n = 34). Data were extracted from the included studies (n = 11), and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for the absolute change in ulcer area. Eleven trials were included, comprising 615 randomised patients, where 340 had venous leg ulcers. Patients who completed follow-up contributed to the healing outcomes (intervention n = 169, controls n = 167). All studies were evaluated to have some or high concerns for risk of bias. Four trials contributed data to the meta-analysis showing that photobiomodulation did not significantly reduce ulcer area compared with controls (Mean Difference 3.77 cm2, 95% CI -4.45 to 11.99; p = 0.37) and heterogeneity was substantial (τ2 = 65.37; I2 = 96%). Current evidence does not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of photobiomodulation on venous leg ulcer healing. High heterogeneity, small sample sizes and methodological limitations reduce confidence in the pooled estimate. Standards for photobiomodulation therapy in venous leg ulcers are still missing, and well-designed RCTs are needed to clarify the therapeutic potential of photobiomodulation.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.