Cross-sectional study2026Open access

Association of problematic short-video use with adolescent depression: a cross-sectional study and machine learning identification model construction

Jiang Z, Kang T, Wu H

BMC psychiatry · 0 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Government
National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents
Government
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Grants
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82001313); National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (GZC20231941)

Based on 3 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-03-31 · BMC Psychiatry · vol. 26 · issue 1
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
1 citation · more than 96% of similar papers · 8.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
64 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
adolescent depression, short video platforms, depression screening, model interpretability, emotion regulation, non-suicidal self-injury, sleep quality, nonlinear dose-response relationship
MeSH
humans, cross-sectional studies, reproducibility of results, depression, adolescent, female, male, machine learning, internet addiction disorder, random forest, boosting machine learning algorithms, predictive learning models, classification algorithms

3 authors

From CN

  • Zhihan JiangTongji University
  • Tiejun KangTongji University; Northwest Normal University
  • Heng Wu · correspondingTongji University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Problematic short-video use (PSVU) is prevalent among adolescents and is increasingly recognized for its association with adverse mental health outcomes. This cross-sectional study aims to explore the association between PSVU and depression using SFPSVUS, and to develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for identifying adolescent depression. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on data from 4000 adolescent participants. Multivariate Logistic Regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) methods were used to assess the association between PSVU and depression. Feature variables were identified via Boruta feature selection and validated using Shapley Additive Interpretation (SHAP) methods. Nine ML models, including XGBoost, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), were developed to identify adolescents with depression. RESULTS: A total of 3816 adolescents were included. The SFPSVUS demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.70) in the current sample. Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between PSVU and depression. RCS analysis indicated a significant nonlinear association between PSVU and adolescent depression. Six variables selected via Boruta feature selection were used to develop nine ML models, with the RF model demonstrating superior performance in identifying depression (AUC = 0.863) in the test set. PSVU emerged as an important feature in the model, alongside emotion regulation, non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: PSVU shows a significant positive association with adolescent depression and serves as an important feature in ML identification models. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.