Cross-sectional study2026

Safety analysis of repeated low-level red light therapy on cone mosaic and microvasculature by adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

Yue Y, Zhang N, Liu KY, Zhong YY, Wang H, Liu SL, Wan WJ, Zhang YL, Deng WL

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 0 citations

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Government
Chongqing Municipal Education Commission
Grants
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900845); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371043); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201168); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82571201); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970832); Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJZD-K202400402)

Based on 2 listed funder(s).

Publication

Published
2026-04-11 · Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther · vol. 59 · p. 105473
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
2 citations · more than 98% of similar papers · 10.9× the field average
Impact
Top 10% most cited in its field
References
32 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Retinal Diseases and Treatments · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Keywords
Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, Retinal, Ophthalmoscopy, Foveal, Adaptive optics, Cone (formal languages), Retina
MeSH
retinal vessels, humans, myopia, ophthalmoscopy, cross-sectional studies, child, female, male, retinal cone photoreceptor cells, microvessels, low-level light therapy, red light

9 authors

From CN

  • Yu YueThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing Medical University
  • Ni ZhangThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing Medical University
  • Ke-Yu LiuThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing Medical University
  • Yuanyuan ZhongThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing Medical University
  • Han WangThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing Medical University
  • Shu-Lin LiuThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; Chongqing Medical University

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the growing use of repeated low-level red light (RLRL) therapy for myopic children, its safety remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze macular cone morphology and retinal microvascular hemodynamics using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) to evaluate retinal microstructural impacts.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Three groups were recruited: Myopia-RLRL (20 eyes; ≥8 months treatment), Myopia-Untreated (32 eyes), and Non-Myopic (14 eyes). RLRL therapy was administered using a 650 nm laser at 0.29 mW, twice daily for 3 min per session. AOSLO was used to assess cone morphology (density, spacing, regularity, dispersion) and retinal microvasculature parameters (vessel diameter, lumen diameter, blood flow velocity).

Results

Cone density was higher in the Non-Myopic group (45,649 ± 5092/mm²) compared to the Myopia-Untreated group (40,202 ± 7365/mm², P = 0.013), with no significant difference versus the Myopia-RLRL group (41,274 ± 6228/mm², P = 0.627). Cone spacing was enlarged in myopic groups relative to non-myopic (P < 0.05). Cone dispersion was lower in the Myopia-RLRL group (16.47 ± 2.43%) than in the Myopia-Untreated (17.36 ± 2.14%, P = 0.030) and Non-Myopic (17.80 ± 2.25%, P = 0.024) groups. No significant intergroup differences were found in cone regularity or microvasculature. Cone density positively correlated with spherical equivalent refraction (r = 0.541) and negatively with axial length (r=-0.594; both P < 0.001).

Conclusions

After 8 months of RLRL therapy, there was no significant loss of cone density or issues with retinal microvasculature. Assessment of retinal arteriole and venule diameters and flow velocity also showed no significant differences. The reduced cone dispersion in the RLRL group suggests potential photobiomodulation effects on photoreceptor organization, indicating the therapy's safety and potential benefits.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.