Cross-sectional study2026Open access

The relationship between childhood trauma, doomscrolling, and dating violence among university students in Türkiye

Adıgüzel V, Eymur A, Topcu A

BMC psychology · 0 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosed

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cross-sectional study (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2026-04-15 · BMC Psychol · vol. 14 · issue 1
Publisher
BioMed Central
Cited
0 citations · more than 33% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
30 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
childhood trauma, doomscrolling, dating violence, university students, mediation, psychological well-being, young adults, social media use, intimate partner violence, Turkey
MeSH
humans, cross-sectional studies, interpersonal relations, students, universities, adolescent, adult, turkey, female, male, young adult, surveys and questionnaires, intimate partner violence, adverse childhood experiences

3 authors

From TR

  • Vesile Adıgüzel · correspondingYalova University
  • Anıl EymurYalova University
  • Aslıhan TopçuYalova University

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Childhood trauma, dating violence, and doomscrolling are increasingly drawing attention as important factors associated with young adults’ psychological well-being and interpersonal functioning. This study was conducted to examine the relationships among childhood trauma, doomscrolling, and dating violence among university students in Türkiye, and to evaluate the role of dating violence in the association between childhood trauma and doomscrolling. METHOD: This descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted with 502 university students in Türkiye between September 20 and November 20, 2025. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-28), the Dating Violence Scale (DVS), and the Doomscrolling Scale–Turkish Form (DS-TF). Number, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were used in data analysis; Pearson correlation analysis and simple linear regression analysis were used to examine the relationships among variables. PROCESS Model 4 was used for the mediation analysis. Ethics committee approval and institutional permission were obtained prior to the study. RESULTS: It was determined that 72.7% of the participants were female and 34.9% were first-year students. The mean total scores were 43.66 ± 15.32 for CTQ-28, 45.11 ± 18.28 for DVS, and 33.94 ± 18.39 for DS-TF. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between CTQ-28 and DVS (r = 0.571, p ≤ 0.001), between CTQ-28 and DS-TF (r = 0.454, p ≤ 0.001), and between DVS and DS-TF (r = 0.478, p ≤ 0.001). Regression analyses showed that childhood trauma significantly predicted dating violence (F = 241.325, p ≤ 0.001; R² = 0.326), dating violence significantly predicted doomscrolling (F = 147.698, p ≤ 0.001; R² = 0.228), and childhood trauma significantly predicted doomscrolling (F = 129.861, p ≤ 0.001; R² = 0.206). Mediation analysis revealed that dating violence partially mediated the relationship between childhood trauma and doomscrolling. CONCLUSION: Positive associations were found among childhood trauma, dating violence, and doomscrolling among university students in Türkiye. The findings support a significant indirect pathway through dating violence; however, causal interpretations are precluded by the cross-sectional design.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.