Author's Reply: Conceptual Confusion about "Processed" Meat

Review labels

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design

Meta-analysis (classified by our AI screen)

Main outcome

Health markers and function

Intake measured by

Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding

Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published

2026-03-26 · Nutr Rev

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Cited

0 citations · more than 31% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average

References

2 works

Access

Paywalled

Research areas

Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Digestive system and related health

Keywords

Confusion, MEDLINE, Conceptual model

5 authors

From DK, CA

• Mina Nicole Händel · correspondingUniversity of Southern Denmark; Frederiksberg Hospital
• Jeanett Friis RohdeFrederiksberg Hospital
• Sofus Christian LarsenFrederiksberg Hospital
• Thorkild I A SørensenUniversity of Copenhagen; Novo Nordisk Foundation; Education and Early Childhood Development
• Berit L. HeitmannUniversity of Copenhagen; Frederiksberg Hospital

Abstract

Europe PMC has no abstract for this paper. Open the source to read it.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher.

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

Comments

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.