Ultraprocessed Food Intake, Cognition, and Executive Function in Adults: A Systematic Review
Wöbbeking-Sánchez M, Chávez-Hernández ME, De La Torre L, Wöbbeking-Sánchez S, Villasán-Rueda A, Salvador-Ginez O, Rodríguez-Serrano LM
Nutrients · 0 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Systematic review (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
- Intake measured by
- Not stated
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
Based on full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2026-04-25 · Nutrients · vol. 18 · issue 9 · p. 1361
- Publisher
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Cited
- 0 citations · more than 26% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
- References
- 48 works
- Access
- Open access (journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- Cognition, Observational study, Scopus, Overweight, Systematic review, Obesity, Association (psychology), Cognitive decline, Consumption (sociology)
- MeSH
- humans, risk factors, cross-sectional studies, cognition, eating, adult, middle aged, female, male, executive function, cognitive dysfunction
7 authors
From ES, MX
- Marina Wöbbeking-SánchezUniversidad de Salamanca
- María Elena Chávez–Hernández · correspondingUniversidad Anáhuac
- Lizbeth De La TorreUniversidad Pontificia de Salamanca
- Silvia Wöbbeking-SánchezUniversidad Internacional De La Rioja
- Alba Villasán RuedaUniversidad Internacional De La Rioja
- Octavio Salvador-GinezUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review examines the association between ultraprocessed food (UPF) intake and cognitive and executive function in adults. Given the global rise in overweight and obesity and the increasing consumption of UPFs, understanding their potential impact on brain health is of growing importance. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EBSCO, and Scopus databases following PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing cross-sectional, longitudinal, and experimental designs. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Results: The majority of studies (78.5%) reported a significant association between higher UPF consumption and poorer cognitive outcomes, including deficits in memory, executive function, and global cognition. Longitudinal studies consistently demonstrated that increased UPF intake is linked to accelerated cognitive decline and a higher risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia, particularly in middle-aged and older adults. In contrast, cross-sectional findings were more heterogeneous, and evidence in younger populations remains limited and inconclusive. Conclusions: Overall, the findings suggest that high UPF consumption may be a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline. However, methodological variability and the predominance of observational studies highlight the need for further longitudinal and experimental research to clarify causal mechanisms.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.