Meta-analysis2026Open access

The cross-sectional and prospective associations between time-restricted eating and cardiometabolic health in community-dwelling adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Feit V, Schmitz N, Knaub K, Schick LM, Mack I, Shojaa M

European journal of clinical nutrition · 0 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding

Based on full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-05-23 · Eur J Clin Nutr · vol. 80 · issue 8 · pp. 747–762
Publisher
Springer Nature
Cited
0 citations · more than 33% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
62 works
Access
Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Dietary Effects on Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
Observational study, CINAHL, Abdominal obesity, Obesity, Metabolic syndrome, Cohort study, Prospective cohort study, MEDLINE
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, adult, obesity, abdominal, observational studies as topic, metabolic syndrome, cardiometabolic risk factors, intermittent fasting

6 authors

From DE

  • Viktoria FeitUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen
  • Norbert SchmitzUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen
  • Katharina KnaubUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen
  • Lea-Marie SchickUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen
  • Isabelle Mack
  • Mahdieh Shojaa · correspondingUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen; University of Tübingen

Abstract

Background/objectives

Well-established cardiometabolic disease (CMD) prevention strategies emphasize maintaining a balanced diet, regular physical activity, and a normal weight. The role of time-restricted eating (TRE; ≤12 h daily eating window) in improving cardiometabolic health remains elusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigated the associations between TRE and cardiometabolic health in adults.

Subjects/methods

We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL for observational studies examining the association between TRE and cardiometabolic markers in adults for all articles published up to January 13, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Qualitative and random-effects meta-analyses were performed if ≥3 studies reported the same outcome; otherwise, results were summarized narratively.

Results

12 cross-sectional and 6 cohort studies were included. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies showed no significant association between TRE and abdominal obesity (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.86-1.07; I² = 59%), metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.90-1.19; I² = 32%), elevated blood pressure/hypertension (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.971.12; I² = 0%), reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.83-1.06; I² = 78%), elevated triglycerides (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.99-1.14; I² = 0%), and prediabetes/type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.96-1.12; I² = 50%). Due to insufficient data, no conclusions could be drawn about prospective associations.

Conclusions

To date, cross-sectional data have not consistently demonstrated associations between TRE and cardiometabolic health in community-dwelling adults. Until stronger real-world evidence emerges, the priority should remain on established CMD prevention strategies. REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023390410.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.