Study2026Open access

Short-Term Effects of Low-Level Red-Light Therapy on Central Retinal Function: A Combined Pattern ERG and Photopic ERG Study

Qasim M, Fernandes P, Jorge J

Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 0 citations

How it was studied

Design
Controlled clinical trial (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
University or hospital
Universidade do Minho
Government
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Grants
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/04650); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/04650/2025); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (04650/2025)

Based on 2 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-05-08 · Vision (Basel) · vol. 10 · issue 2 · p. 26
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
0 citations · more than 41% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
0 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
Photopic vision, Electroretinography, Erg, Retinal, Retina, Electrophysiology

3 authors

From PT

  • Muhammad Qasim · correspondingCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e do Porto; University of Minho
  • Paulo Fernandes · correspondingCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e do Porto; University of Minho
  • Jorge JorgeCentro de Física das Universidades do Minho e do Porto; University of Minho

Abstract

Background: Low-level red-light therapy (RLRT) has emerged as a potential therapy in myopia management. However, its effects on retinal structure and function following repeated exposure remain incompletely understood. Purpose: To evaluate the short-term effects of RLRT on central retinal function in myopes and non-myopes using retinal electrophysiology and structural parameters. Methods: Thirty-six subjects underwent RLRT exposures. Retinal function was assessed using pattern electroretinography (PERG) and photopic full-field electroretinography (Photopic 3.0 ERG). Structural measurements, including axial length (AL), obtained with an optical biometer and choroidal thickness (CT), were measured using MOPTIM 3000. Outcomes were compared between baseline and post-RLRT conditions (single 3 min and single 1 min exposure), across refractive groups, and correlated with AL and CT. This study was conducted at the University of Minho in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: In myopic subjects, PERG N35-P50 amplitude significantly increased after 3 min of RLRT (baseline:0.88 ± 0.21 µV; post: 1.40 ± 0.25 µV; p = 0.013), whereas no significant changes were observed in non-myopes (baseline: 1.32 ± 0.19 µV; post: 1.39 ± 0.21 µV; p = 0.47). Latencies remained stable across all groups (p > 0.05). No significant correlations were found between PERG and AL (ρ = -0.18, p = 0.44) or CT (ρ = 0.12, p = 0.52). Photopic 3.0 ERG showed an increase in b-wave amplitude after 3 min of RLRT in myopes (Δ = +2.42 µV, p = 0.06), but not in non-myopes. In myopes, AL was negatively correlated with post-therapy latency (ρ = -0.624, p = 0.060), while CT showed strong correlations with photopic a-wave responses after 1 min RLRT (CT vs. latency: ρ = -0.873, p = 0.010; CT vs. amplitude: ρ = 0.821, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Short-term exposure to RLRT, particularly at 3 min, enhances PERG and Photopic ERG responses in myopic subjects, suggesting transient improvements in retinal function with differential effects between refractive groups.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.