Study2026

Processed meat intake and incident gout: Integrated evidence from epidemiology, plasma proteomics, and machine learning

Wang Z, Shi D, Pan X, Chen W, Zheng S, Liu S, Zhao J, Tang X, Qin Y

Journal of advanced research · 0 citations

Review labels

Funding not disclosedNo stated lifestyle adjustment

Neutral facts our review recorded about how this study was done. They describe method, never whether we like the result.

How it was studied

Design
Cohort study (classified by our AI screen)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Clinical events such as disease or death
Intake measured by
Not stated

Who paid for it

Funding
Funding not disclosed

Publication

Published
2026-07-01 · J Adv Res
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Cited
0 citations · more than 58% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
46 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Research areas
Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Gout, Proportional hazards model, Hazard ratio, Biobank, Cohort, Prospective cohort study, Cohort study, Red meat

9 authors

From CN, GB

  • Zhengda WangJilin University
  • Daqian ShiQueen Mary University of London
  • Xiangjun PanJilin University
  • Wei ChenJilin University
  • Shengyuan ZhengJilin University
  • Shibo LiuJilin University

Abstract

Introduction

Gout is a common metabolic inflammatory disorder whose incidence parallels modern dietary shifts. Although processed meat intake is linked to metabolic dysregulation, its independent association with incident gout and related biological signatures remains unclear.

Objectives

To investigate the association between processed meat intake and incident gout and to characterize related biological signatures using integrated epidemiological, machine-learning, and plasma proteomic approaches.

Methods

This prospective cohort study included 395,356 UK Biobank participants free of gout at baseline. Associations between processed meat intake and incident gout were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and time-varying Cox proportional hazards models. Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors were incorporated into the analyses. Supervised machine learning models were applied to evaluate the relative importance of behavioral determinants. In a proteomic subcohort, circulating proteins jointly associated with processed meat intake and gout were identified, followed by pathway enrichment analyses.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 15.7 years, 8,215 participants developed gout. Higher processed meat intake was independently associated with increased gout risk, with hazard ratios of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.06-1.18, P < 0.001) and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07-1.31, P < 0.001) for middle and high intake, respectively, compared with low intake. In time-varying Cox proportional hazards models, the corresponding risk estimates increased to 1.52 (95% CI: 1.19-1.95, P < 0.001) and 1.84 (95% CI: 1.14-2.98, P = 0.012). Lower socioeconomic status and unfavorable lifestyle profiles were also associated with higher gout risk. Proteomic analyses identified 40 plasma proteins jointly associated with processed meat intake and gout status, suggesting potential involvement of biological processes related to metabolic dysregulation, inflammation, and neuroendocrine signaling.

Conclusions

Processed meat intake was independently associated with a higher risk of incident gout. These findings support a consideration of processed meat intake within broader dietary, socioeconomic, and lifestyle contexts, and provide exploratory proteomic evidence for biological processes potentially related to this association.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY-NC-ND).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.