Meta-analysis2026Open access

Comprehensive Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Mohammadi S, Palermo A, Ojani P, Alaghemand N, Pirayvatlou PS, Mirkarimi M, Mavi SA, Tahouri K, Shokouhifar S, Ettehad Y, Borzabadi A, Ashtary-Larky D, Suzuki K, Bouzas C, Rodrigues D, Tur JA

Nutrients · 0 citations

How it was studied

Design
Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
Studied in
People
Main outcome
Health markers and function

Who paid for it

Funding
Independent funding
Government
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Government
European Regional Development
Government
Ministerio de Ciencias e Innovación, Spain
University or hospital
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands
Grants
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CIBEROBN CB12/03/30038)

Based on 4 listed funder(s) and full-text disclosure statement.

Publication

Published
2026-07-25 · Nutrients · vol. 18 · issue 15 · p. 2435
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Cited
0 citations · more than 56% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
References
0 works
Access
Open access (journal) · CC-BY
Research areas
Magnesium in Health and Disease · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
Glycated hemoglobin, Blood pressure, Glycemic, Insulin resistance, Lipid profile, Body mass index, Lipoprotein, Homeostatic model assessment, Randomized controlled trial
MeSH
humans, magnesium, blood glucose, lipids, risk factors, blood pressure, dose-response relationship, drug, dietary supplements, randomized controlled trials as topic, biomarkers, cardiometabolic risk factors

16 authors

From MY, IT, US, IR, JP, ES, PT

  • Shooka MohammadiUniversity of Malaya
  • Andrea PalermoUniversità Campus Bio-Medico
  • Pantea OjaniBoston University
  • Navid AlaghemandAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
  • Pouyan Sanjari PirayvatlouSaint Agnes Medical Center
  • Mohammadreza MirkarimiAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the impacts of magnesium (Mg) supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) remains inconsistent. Objectives: This systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis evaluated effects of Mg supplementation on anthropometric indices, liver and kidney function, lipid and glycemic profiles, blood pressure, and inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases up to May 2026 identified 78 eligible randomized controlled trials. Results: Mg supplementation significantly reduced body weight (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.70 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.30, -0.09), diastolic blood pressure (WMD: -1.58 mmHg; 95% CI: -2.50, -0.65), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (WMD: -0.48; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.18), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD: -3.21 mg/dL; 95% CI: -5.27, -1.15), fasting blood glucose (WMD: -3.60 mg/dL; 95% CI: -6.13, -1.06), systolic blood pressure (WMD: -2.50 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.08, -0.91), glycated hemoglobin (WMD: -0.15%; 95% CI: -0.26, -0.03), triglycerides (WMD: -9.24 mg/dL; 95% CI: -16.87, -1.61), and interleukin-6 levels (WMD: -1.10 pg/mL; 95% CI: -1.93, -0.27) compared with controls. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations significantly increased (WMD: 1.45 mg/dL; 95% CI: 0.37, 2.54). No significant effects were identified on hip circumference, alanine aminotransferase, waist circumference, tumor necrosis factor-α, creatinine, C-reactive protein, body mass index, total cholesterol, fasting insulin, body fat percentage, and aspartate aminotransferase. Most RCTs (79.5%) administered Mg doses ≥ 300 mg/day, and 66.7% had intervention durations ≥ 12 weeks; however, evidence from higher-dose (≥500 mg/day) and longer-term (≥25 weeks) interventions remained limited. Conclusions: Mg supplementation was associated with significant improvements in several CMRFs, including body weight, lipid and glycemic profiles, blood pressure, and interleukin-6 levels. However, these effects were generally modest, and their clinical relevance remains uncertain given the variable certainty of evidence across outcomes.

Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).

Community trust

Loading…

How much do you trust this study's findings?

0 · not at all10 · completely

Comments

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Something wrong here?

Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.

Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign in

Educational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.