Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for subacromial impingement syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Chen L, Wang Y
Lasers in medical science · 0 citations
How it was studied
- Design
- Meta-analysis (indexed by PubMed)
- Studied in
- People
- Main outcome
- Health markers and function
Who paid for it
- Funding
- Independent funding
Based on full-text disclosure statement.
Publication
- Published
- 2026-09-14 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 41 · issue 1
- Publisher
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Cited
- 0 citations · more than 78% of similar papers · 0.0× the field average
- References
- 44 works
- Access
- Open access (hybrid journal) · CC-BY
- Research areas
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
- Keywords
- Subacromial impingement, Range of motion, Randomized controlled trial, Low level laser therapy, External rotation, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Internal rotation, Meta-analysis
- MeSH
- humans, shoulder impingement syndrome, range of motion, articular, treatment outcome, randomized controlled trials as topic, low-level light therapy
2 authors
From CN
- Liangsheng Chen · correspondingHenan Provincial People's Hospital
- Yage Wang · correspondingFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University
Abstract
To systematically explore the therapeutic effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain, shoulder range of motion (ROM), and functional disability in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Eight databases were systematically searched. We assessed study quality with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Seventeen studies and twenty-one RCTs were included, with 1118 patients enrolled. Relative to the control group, LLLT markedly reduced pain (MD = -0.54, 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.02, P = 0.04). LLLT also significantly improved shoulder flexion (MD = 4.35, 95% CI: 1.13 to 7.58, P = 0.008), abduction (MD = 3.72, 95% CI: 0.79 to 6.64, P = 0.01), and external rotation (MD = 1.96, 95% CI: 0.51 to 3.42, P = 0.008). However, no significant improvement was found in shoulder extension (MD = 0.79, 95% CI: -0.47 to 2.06, P = 0.22), internal rotation (MD = 1.14, 95% CI: -1.51 to 3.78, P = 0.40), and functional disability (MD = -3.61, 95% CI: -9.49 to 2.26, P = 0.23). Low-quality evidence suggests that LLLT effectively alleviates pain in patients with SIS and enhances shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation ROM. Very low-quality evidence indicates that LLLT exerts no significant effect on shoulder functional disability, extension, and internal rotation ROM. Additionally, we suggest that clinicians reassess the need for continued treatment when the number of sessions approaches 12, rather than routinely adopting extended protocols. Owing to the high heterogeneity among the included studies, the above conclusions are regarded as exploratory findings.
Abstract via Europe PMC. Copyright remains with the authors or publisher (CC BY).
Community trust
Loading…
How much do you trust this study's findings?
Comments
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inSomething wrong here?
Flag this study if its information, labels or funding look wrong. An editor reviews every flag.
Sign in to rate, comment on or flag this study.Sign inEducational information about published research. Not medical advice, and not a recommendation to start or stop anything.